Wayne Besen - Author, Activist, Columnist, Public Speaker

Thursday, November 23, 2006

(Weekly Column)

It is time the gay movement took the religious right's advice and created a gay agenda. The new Democratic Congress is about to triumphantly take the reins, offering a unique opportunity to pass legislation, but we must tread carefully to avoid repeating past mistakes.

In 1993, President Bill Clinton waltzed into Washington and advocated allowing openly gay patriots to serve in the military. While this was commendable, he moved too fast, too soon and the resulting brouhaha damaged his presidency and saddled the gay community with today's Don't Ask/Don't Tell fiasco.

One lesson from the past is that if gay issues are haphazardly introduced they can be radioactive and sidetrack the Democratic Party's broader agenda. If the Democrats are seen as kowtowing to a controversial special interest group the moment they are in the majority it may jeopardize their ability to reach mainstream Americans.

On the other side of the coin, the gay community has been a loyal constituency group and our basic rights should be protected as a matter of morality. The way to reconcile this ostensible conflict is for major gay political organizations to have an early strategic powwow with incoming House speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

The gay leaders should offer to step back and make no demands for six months to let the Democrats establish a tangible record on bread and butter economic issues. The party must establish itself as one that represents all people and cares most about the concerns of average families.Once party leaders have built a reserve of political capital and are able to boast of bipartisan accomplishments they will have earned credentials with suburban families and can address gay rights without looking like they are pandering.

Democratic leaders should agree that for the GLBT community's six months of silence a major piece of legislation would be introduced in June. The most logical legislation would be the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation. However, I think we should scrap ENDA in its current antiquated form and return to a broader bill that also bans discrimination in housing, credit and accommodations.

ENDA made more sense when there were several influential members of Congress who were opposed to employment discrimination, but balked at losing the ability to discriminate in housing. But the world has evolved and I suspect there are few members of Congress who now advocate situational discrimination. So, why not go for a more robust bill if there are enough votes to win?

It is crucial that GLBT leaders get a commitment from Pelosi and Reid to energetically push a gay rights bill or ENDA in its current incarnation. Polls show that most Americans are overwhelmingly against discrimination, so it is a winning issue as long as the Democrats hold firm. If they appear weak and embarrassed to support equality it will be a disaster. The GLBT community will feel betrayed and lose faith in the Party, while the Democrats will play to stereotypes that they have no core beliefs or principles.

Once a non-discrimination bill is passed there is a good chance that President George W. Bush will veto it. There is not much we can do about this, except use it as a political rallying cry to get more Democrats elected to office. The Republicans may try to use this bill as a political weapon, but I think it will backfire. In a recent column I predicted that the New Jersey Supreme Court's ruling mandating civil unions would have little affect on the Midterm elections. I correctly reasoned that the discussion on marriage had moved the bar to where civil unions are now boring and no longer political poison. The same argument can be made for an ENDA-type bill, with marriage rendering it quaint and uncontroversial.

After this bill is passed, we should take our lobbyists off of Capital Hill for another six months and do nothing else until 2008. In this presidential election year, we should introduce hate crimes legislation, which has the least potential to create a backlash, since even our opponents profess that gay bashing is wrong.

Unfortunately, I left off my short list overturning the ban on gays in the military. I think we should steer clear of this issue until after the presidential elections. This topic is too prone to demagoguery with conservatives, once again, descending into submarine barracks. If a Democrat wins the presidency and the party holds both branches of Congress, this would be a good issue for 2009.

Conservatives are right - we need a gay agenda. If our groups strategically and systematically work with Pelosi and Reid we can eat our victory cake and they can still win reelection in a cakewalk.

35 Comments:

Wayne,

Couldn't agree more. We need a strategy. We need to be patient yet aggressive. Can I get my ideas off of my chest? As a father, one thing I have always thought is we need to turn this more and more, into a family issue. Family values are on our side.

Unfortunately, it will be a while before the general public feels empathy for gay people. Many still don't for black people and that form of discrimination was exposed for what it is years ago. Most people are simply unmoved by the idea that gay couples may not be able to visit each other in the hospital and the like. Too many believe that we are so evil and morally bankrupt that we almost deserve it.

I think we need to work hard to show the faces of normal gay families. We need to show how children are hurt by current policies.

We need to show children and explain how both their parents may not be able to a medical decision for them because joint adoption is so complex and expensive. Children of married, heterosexual parents do not face this risk.

We need to show children who for the same reason cannot be put on one of their parents health insurance policies.

We need to show how children suffer because their parents cannot get the same tax benefits. That thousands of dollars a year go to Uncle Sam instead of college savings. (aren't these tax breaks there to benefit all children, not just those in 2 parent heterosexually headed families?)

We need to show children who's stability is threatened in the unfortunate situation of a parental breakup because of goofy laws and views of their parents relationship.

People don't give a rats ass about us, and it will be a long time before most do. Many people will never come to like the issue of gay marriage. But I think many people will be moved when they see how the current system discriminates against children simply because they are part of a gay family.
posted by Steve - Geneva, IL, at 11/23/2006 3:53 PM

Wayne and Steve;

Well written and written with wisdom.

I concur and feel the issue of children and families broadens the audience, and extends the discussion into one of values that revolve around 'the least of these' - a greater number of children are in poverty than any other demographic. They resemble LGBTQ people in political terms, a minority with limited political representation. Another constituency is women, particulary single women. Many of them are impoverished due to the laws of this land, and the endlessly repeated 'welfare queen' frame.

We would do well to acquaint the gay community of the condition of women in this country, because at its core, anti-gay hysteria is about mysogyny - wanting to keep people disempowered because of their gender or sexual and affectional orientation. One need only look at the ludicrous statements about Ted Haggard made by Seattle mega-church head Mark Driscoll.

Keep up the good work. You are among my many reasons for thanksgiving on this day.

Dan
posted by Anonymous, at 11/23/2006 5:48 PM

You have some great ideas, Wayne. When are you running for Congress? (No sarcasm intended) We need more people with your ideas and philosophy involved in politics.

Happy Holidays everyone from my family to yours!

Clif, Barry, Chewy, and Mo-Mo
posted by petshopboyclifton, at 11/23/2006 6:35 PM

It's a terrible idea to suggest that the ban on homosexuals serving openly in the military should be overturned. Few if any heterosexual men want to serve at close quarters with homosexuals. Forcing heterosexual men to shower with homosexuals is a violation of their privacy, for the same reason that forcing them to shower with women would be.
posted by Anonymous, at 11/23/2006 8:04 PM

Newsflash, anonymous- chances are you've already showered with homosexuals. I'm guessing your toes didn't curl up and fall off.
posted by Boo, at 11/23/2006 9:54 PM

There is a big difference between showering with men who do not reveal their sexual orientation but who are most likely heterosexual and showering with men who are openly and avowedly homosexual. The latter is an experience most heterosexual men would want to avoid having.
posted by Anonymous, at 11/23/2006 11:58 PM

Wayne,

Well said. The Democrats also need smart sound bite. Aside from the individual legislative issues at hand, the Dems have always done a poor job of explaining their position(s) in simple sound bites.

The Dems should not also be afraid to mention the "holy" book of the USA, the Constitution when arguing for GLBTQ rights.

Dave

"One's right to life, liberty and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."

Justice Jackson, W.V. Board of Ed. vs. Brunette
posted by Q-Jersey-201, at 11/24/2006 11:55 AM

Some states have already been using a thoughfully-planned "gay agenda". In Iowa, we have picked our battles carefully and over the last 2 elections have succeeded in getting more fair-minded politicians elected in Iowa and more unfair politicians removed from office. As a result, in the next session, we should be able to get two bills passed into law: an anti-bullying bill specifying sexual orientation and a bill adding sexual orientation to the statewide civil rights act covering employment, housing, and public accommodations. We have been successful warding off an anti-marriage amendment to our state constitution. This has happened because a lot of hardworking volunteers across the state have worked together to carefully support this progress. For example, forums have been held across the state to discuss creating safe schools for GLBT youth. Unlike too many other states, Iowa has many people of faith who support equality and they have been vitally important in pursuing human rights protection for all Iowans. More states need to work on the basics such as humanizing GLBT human rights issues and making certain public educational efforts accompany any lobbying efforts. The public cares more about "gay people" when they are described in familiar terms, such as gay brother or sister, gay son or daughter. They may not like the idea of protecting "gay people" from discrimination but generally agree that every parent has the right to expect their children, gay or straight, will be protected from discrimination. Often it is how appeals are framed that determines whether they are effective. Campaigns need to think less about what is being said and more about what is being heard by the audience you are trying to influence.
posted by Brian, at 11/24/2006 12:02 PM

Great ideas Wayne--do you have the ear of any influential Democrats? And as for 'no-showers with gays' anonymous---tough shit if they are uncomfortable! If they cant handle it, they shouldnt be in the military. Other countries with gays openly serving in the military dont have these problems (of course they're generally less neurotic about sex than Americans are too). This is no different than a gay Dr touching a man's genitals or a straight ob-gyn examining a woman's vagina and uterus. It's the 21st century--GROW UP!
B. Queer
posted by Anonymous, at 11/24/2006 12:03 PM

A good friend of mine is in Baghdad right this moment. In fact, we emailed each other the day before Thanksgiving. He is an incredible soldier and has been told so by his superiors. The fact that this country makes him hide who he is, despite the fact that he does an excellent job risking his life for all of us, is a stain on our flag.

This policy makes America less than "great". It is a policy which comes out of complete small-mindedness and abject ignorance. It is the very kind of ignorance and pettiness, even, that is expressed in the statement that "gays and straights shouldn't be forced to shower together". These are the thoughts of insecure hick-town residents who never crossed the "county line" and who don't know what a passport looks like.

I am beginning to develop a theory about these uneducated "conservative moralizers" and it is this: deep down, on some level, they are aware that their own moral fiber is so incredibly weak and fragile that they are propelled to constantly pontificate. Their phoney, pious judgemnentalism is an ovveraction to an insecurity about their own lack of common decency.
posted by Chris L., at 11/24/2006 12:25 PM

I think children being used to illustrate that hurting children belonging to gay people won't serve a good and civil and organized society.
Perhaps pointing out that SINGLE characteristic discrimination and not the merit offered by all citizens hurt our society before.
Single characteristics that aren't shared by all people, but doesn't hurt anyone...and can be woven into equal standards of citizenship.
I would suggest too, that those who argue that children REQUIRE a man and a woman, as the ideal parent would first have to look for the IDEAL man and woman...and who is that?
TWO parents are better than one.
Just as a parent with two hands is better than a parent with one?
A parent without a genectic disease is better than a parent with one?
A parent without a disability is better than a parent WITH one, or TWO?

Parents who never drink alcohol are better than parents who do?
The slippery slope isn't that GAY couples get married.
But idealizing the man and woman.
And further, since COUPLES can marry, regardless of parenthood or intention of it?
Why is that standard set in marriage ONLY for gay people who don't 'naturally procreate' our marriage laws don't require it.
And since vital protections and decisions like insurance, inheritance and medical directives are written into marriage and family law, and ONLY gay people are excluded from marriage-it IS unfair that straight couples have the option of marrying.
And if they don't want to, then treatment based on UNMARRIED status should apply equally too.
But we all know, straight people who are simply opposite sex, don't have the law enforced against them.
If only straight people were CONSISTENT when it comes to civil law.
They keep moving the goal post when it comes to gay lives, and then they wonder why we sometimes miss the mark.

We have irrefutable logic on our side.
Keep the facts in front of everything...and eventually the prejudice, illogic and unworkable will speak for itself.
posted by Regan, at 11/24/2006 12:52 PM

B. Queer, if showering with people who are sexually attracted to you is not a problem, then should women shower with heterosexual men? There's no reason why not if one accepts your logic, but I do think most people would have a problem with that idea.
posted by Anonymous, at 11/24/2006 3:52 PM

To reduce the issue of Lesbians and Gay men being allowed to serve their country openly to the level of a "don't drop the soap" joke is ludicrous beyond belief! And I can't believe you had the nerve to even bring it up. Whether heterosexual folk know it or not, they're showering with Gay people. Whether they're in the military or not, they're showering with Gay people! If you're a soldier and the idea of being nude next to a Lesbian or Gay man freaks you out so much, you damn well should have been screened out in the psychological examinations! I don't want you defending me with firearms if you're that unstable! We're at WAR, dammit . . . everybody's in the same boat. Let's dispense with the phony "unit cohesion" arguments already!
posted by Stuffed Animal, at 11/24/2006 5:59 PM

Dear Wayne,
Thank you for an inspiring and inspired commentary. Yes, we need a gay agenda and we must be not only smart but also spirtually generous in devising it. I think that the issue of legal protection for the children of gay parents would not only resonate among the general electorate, but would also demonstrate our moral values - something that the religious right claims we are completely lacking, and which those whose hearts are filled with hate are more than willing to believe. We can jump start our liberation from second-class citizenship, and begin it by advocating social justice for those who are the most vulnerable. Let's do it!
posted by Anonymous, at 11/24/2006 10:14 PM

I think that repealing DADT should be at the top of our agenda.

I am not disparaging ENDA or hate crimes legislation. I simply think that repealing DADT is more important to us in the long run.

About 20% of gay men and about 10% of lesbian are veterans -- but gays and lesbians cannot serve openly.

The national discussion about equal treatment of gays and lesbians has centered, for the most part, about "rights". We need to shift the discussion, to "responsibilities".

As trite as it sounds, I believe that there is great power in the perception "if they are willing to put their life on the line for this country ..."

Repealing DADT will drive home to the American people that gays and lesbians bear the fullest responsibilities of citizenship on an equal footing with straights.

I believe, in the long run, nothing is more important to us than making that clear to the American people.

I think that it is significant that the African-American civil rights movement did not gain traction until African-Americans served on an equal footing in the military, bearing the hardships and the risks alongside whites.

I think that repeal of DADT is a critical next step in our movement toward equal treatment until the law.

Repealing DADT should be at the top of our agenda.
posted by Tom Scharbach, at 11/25/2006 9:20 AM

Chris L, you're right, a friend of mine has a theory that people who are extremely religious while pointing the finger at others are really 'bastards and assume everyone else is too' his words not mine. And to anonymous (of course) your argument is specious. Following your logic we can only have openly gay people in military or public showers if we have 4 of them. 2 for heteros of the opp sex and 1 for gay men and 1 for lesbians. I reiterate; other MATURE countries that have openly gay military personnel dont have a problem with this as I've already said. And if a hetero person *does*, they can get the hell out! Why should a gay person have their career aspirations ruined because some neurotic asshole is afraid they might look as his peepee. Either cope with racial, sexual, ethnic and religious diversity or DONT sign up!
B. Queer
posted by Anonymous, at 11/25/2006 10:10 AM

Chris L: [DADT] is a policy which comes out of complete small-mindedness and abject ignorance. It is the very kind of ignorance and pettiness, even, that is expressed in the statement that "gays and straights shouldn't be forced to shower together".

Right on. And, to be blunt about it, the idea that gays and lesbians, who have put blood on the ground for this country in every war we've had, shouldn't serve openly because straights might have personal discomfort about serving with gays and lesbians -- simple, unadorned, ignorant fear -- is remarkably arrogant and offensive.

Military service involves risk and sacrifice, the willingness to put your life on the line in a tight spot. Any straight person who would not serve because of personal discomfort about serving with gays and lesbians isn't fit for military service. If a person is so wrapped up in themselves so as to be afraid of a shower, how could you possibly count on such a person in combat?

Our country does not deserve the sacrifice of gays and lesbians who served when I did, back in the days when it was illegal for us to serve, and serve now under DADT. And that is a simple fact.

DADT is a disgrace. It is every bit as disgraceful as the policies in effect when I served. It is time for straight folks to grow up.
posted by Tom Scharbach, at 11/25/2006 12:03 PM

B. Queer, you are of course ignoring my point. My reasoning is not that there should be separate showers for homosexual men, which would be absurd and impractical, but that homosexual men have no place in the military. Would you consider a woman who didn't want to shower with heterosexual men, or a heterosexual man who didn't want to shower with women, a "neurotic asshole"?
posted by Anonymous, at 11/25/2006 1:12 PM

Oh goodie... a call to put the Democratic Party ahead of equality.

Frankly, if the Democrats were able to bring about greater equality for gay people and in the process lost every other battle over taxes, spending, social projects, Iraq, education or anything else, they would in the future be considered a success.

Ultimately, equality of the citizenry is a goal that trumps any and all other agenda items. And it saddens me to see gay people willing to put equality for anyone - and especially equality for themselves - at a lower value than the advacement of a political party.
posted by Timothy Kincaid, at 11/25/2006 4:23 PM

And YOU anon are ignoring MY point which is that homophobes have NO PLACE in the military. As i've said TWICE already, if they cant handle being around gays (or any other people that make them uncomfortable) DONT SIGN UP!!! We victims of fear and ignorance are NOT going to go quietly away anymore. WE AINT DRIVIN YO ASS NO MO MISS DAISY!!!!
B Queer
posted by Anonymous, at 11/25/2006 4:49 PM

"My reasoning is not that there should be separate showers for homosexual men, which would be absurd and impractical, but that homosexual men have no place in the military."

Sheesh! What's this obsession with showers? Both the Israeli and British militaries seem to have integrated gays into their ranks without a problem.

Anonymous shouldn't flatter himself; most gay guys probably wouldn't give him the time of day, much less give him the eye.
posted by Sabra, at 11/27/2006 10:22 AM

Why do gay men have no business being in the military? That is a ridiculous statement. I used to date a Marine. He was as patriotic, as heroic, and as strong as any Marine. His only downfall was that he had to hide his sexuality or risk losing everything he had worked for; strived for; loved. That was the one relationship I ended. It was too difficult for me to be hidden in the shadows. It was too difficult for me to have to help him get ready for dates so that his CO wouldn't suspect anything. And for the record, most of his close friends in his unit knew and did not care. And, yes, they showered with him and didn't for a moment think that he was cruising them. And for the record, past puberty, we don't go for straight guys. It's a losing proposition. And everyone with half a brain knows that. Even military men in showers. Or Football players in showers. Or Hockey players in showers. I could go on. Shall I go on?? LOL
posted by jekelhyde, at 11/27/2006 7:33 PM

"And for the record, past puberty, we don't go for straight guys." This is beside the point, and vaguely amusing, but go on if you like.
posted by Anonymous, at 11/28/2006 2:42 AM

Fine, but the original question remains unanswered. Why do you think homosexual men have no business being in the military?
posted by jekelhyde, at 11/29/2006 10:20 PM

Wayne,
Hummmm, I didn't know I/we-were/are
a "special interest" group.
posted by Dominick J., at 11/30/2006 5:36 PM

runescape money runescape gold runescape gold runescape money buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape items runescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold lotro gold buy lotro gold runescape money runescape power leveling runescape money runescape gold dofus kamas cheap runescape money cheap runescape gold Hellgate Palladium Hellgate London Palladium Hellgate money Tabula Rasa gold tabula rasa money Tabula Rasa Credit Tabula Rasa Credits Hellgate gold Hellgate London gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft PowerLeveling Warcraft Power Leveling World of Warcraft PowerLeveling World of Warcraft Power Leveling runescape power leveling runescape powerleveling eve isk eve online isk eve isk eve online isk tibia gold Fiesta Silver Fiesta Gold SilkRoad Gold buy SilkRoad Gold runescape accounts buy runescape accounts rs2 accounts buy rs2 accounts runescape power leveling rs2 power leveling FFXI Gil buy FFXI Gil gaia gold buy gaia gold buy dofus kamas buy dofus kamas dofus kamas
posted by Anonymous, at 3/13/2008 11:22 PM

wow gold cheap wow gold buy wow gold world of warcraft gold wow world of warcraft wow gold WoW Warrior WoW Hunter WoW Rogue WoW Paladin WoW Shaman WoW Priest WoW Mage WoW Druid WoW Warlock power leveling powerleveling wow power leveling wow powerleveling wow guides wow tips google排名 google左侧排名 google排名服务百度推广百度排名网站推广商业吧机床 LED灯电池塑料摄像机移民甲醇染料福州热线体育博客股票博客游戏博客魔兽博客考试博客汽车博客房产博客电脑博客 powerlin518 logo design website design web design 商标设计
posted by Anonymous, at 3/18/2008 9:49 PM

　　心中一阵不安升降机，因为我忽然又想起了那道剑光升降平台，可怕的剑光升降台，美丽的剑光登车桥。为什么那一剑是那么的美丽货架，却又那么的可怕呢集装袋？在我倒下之前我说地磅，好美的剑塑料托盘，好恨的剑塑料托盘。我倒下了仓储笼。在我失去知觉之前仓储笼，我听到他说北京货架，这叫艺术超市货架，剑的艺术北京货架。

　　我并没有死广州货架，原来我的心是在右边仓储货架，而是不是左边货架厂。所以在那穿胸一剑之下我并没有死南京货架。

　　是一阵暴雨把我冲醒了货架公司。听说雨是上天的眼泪深圳货架，也许这天又有人死在那美丽的剑光之下吧服装货架！我张开嘴巴托盘，任雨水打进我的嘴托盘，直冲我的胃塑料托盘。我的伤口又开始流血塑料托盘，但已经不痛了木托盘。试问：仓储笼一个心已经死了的人仓储笼，肉体上的疼痛又算得了什么呢仓储笼？我知道我的刀再练一百年也无法那么美丽仓储笼，那么恨托盘，而且永远别想杀了他托盘。

　　我退出江湖了手推车，我没有通知江湖上的朋友们静音手推车，并来一个什么金盆洗手静音手推车，因为我的朋友们差不多都被他杀了置物架。我悄悄的走了置物架，隐进了山林之中堆垛架。俨然一个世外高人的样子堆垛架，每天一壶绿茶登高车，放在身边的几上登高车，然后或盯着一朵白云超市手推车，或盯着一片树叶物流手推车，或双目紧闭物流台车。我的刀在玉盆中泡了七七四十九天角钢货架，已经没有血腥味了角钢货架。然后我把它放在我的屋顶轻型货架，任它风吹雨打轻型货架。

　　十年就这年过去了中型货架。为何今天天忽然想起那柄剑中型货架，那道剑光重型货架？而且内心为什么如此不安重型货架？不应该是这样的仓库货架，对于一个喝了十年绿茶的人来说服装货架，面对死上海货架，也已不再惧怕精品货架，不再不安苏州货架，但今天又为何如此呢托盘货架？

　　莫非是他青岛货架，和他的剑库房货架，加上他的剑光沈阳货架。我已不问江湖之事天津货架，想他十年前也应该坐上武林盟主的位子了杭州货架，一个武林中人做了武林盟主山东货架，这一生还有什么要求的呢文件柜？

　　我不停的喝着绿茶工具柜。绿茶静心工具柜。但此时怎么也静不下来零件柜。茶已尽工作台。平时茶尽之时工作台，正也是日落之时工作桌。

　　一定快有什么事情发生了工作桌。

　　剑还是那美丽的剑Google左侧排名，如果再加上一道剑光吹塑机，就会形成剑的艺术色带，武学的艺术电源插座。

　　我问反光背心：为何还来找我滚针轴承，我已在十年之前就退出江湖了夜光粉。

　　他说文化石：因为你没死缎带，因为我没有对手风火轮。

　　我说激光打标机：十年前已不是你的对手平衡机，何况现在十年未动刀大功率led。

　　他说磁力泵：放眼天下梯子，只有你一个人是我的对手网眼袋，也只你一个人对我的威胁无尘布。

　　我不再说话手摇手电筒，因为我不知道说什么手板，我知道我十年前就开始找我毛巾布，发现我没有死就开始找我磁钢。我不死促销台，他心不安模具钢材。

　　他说时尚配饰：拿出你的刀筛网。

　　我说齿轮泵：我已无刀天使花房，命托辊，亦可有可无色丁。

　　他盯着我广告衫，握剑的手越来越紧钢坯，我知道那道美丽的剑光可能随时发出过滤网。在那美丽过后疏水阀，我的生命将画上句号胸章。

　　阳光照在了刀上发热管，反射到他的脸上手机耳机。他发现了那把刀螺杆，我的刀插销，宝刀蝴蝶，没有鞘的刀工具包。

　　刀已在我手中点钞机，刀还是那把刀配电箱，人却已不是那个人流苏，因为心不是那颗心沙滩巾。

　　他为了杀我竟找了我十年氯化镁，而为了和我比武竟帮我从屋顶拿下我的刀来双面胶带，并放在我的手中碳纤维。我忽然发现排线，他也变了汽车座垫，他在后悔十年前将所有高手都杀绝珍珠奶茶。

　　高手的悲哀太阳伞。
　　我握紧了刀桥架，我看着他的眼tpr，已经不再像十年前那样明亮了钢丝。

　　他的剑划出柴油发电机组，划出一道美丽的剑光护栏。我想围栏，这十年他大概在不停地使自己的剑光更美围栏。

　　我的刀也出了隔离网。简单的动作隔离网，一刀刺进了他的胸网片。那道美丽的光忽然停止网片，停在我的衣服上南京货架。

　　他说北京货架：这也是艺术北京货架，杀人的艺术北京货架，想不到你十年不动刀还懂这个艺术仓储货架。

　　我说仓储货架：因为我不想再让你痛苦了广州货架。

　　他说广州货架：谢谢货架厂。

　　我走了货架公司。我头也不回的走了塑料托盘。没有取回我的刀塑料托盘，因为我觉得它在我身边已经没用塑料托盘，我后悔我十年前为什么不扔了它塑料托盘？我听到了尸体倒下的声音塑料托盘。我流泪了塑料托盘，我真的不想杀他仓储笼，十年前不想仓储笼，十年后也不想仓储笼，因为我下山时答应过师父仓储笼，一切让着他仓储笼。

　　我叹了一口气仓储笼。远去仓储笼。
posted by SEO, at 3/31/2008 11:52 PM

cheap wow gold
buy wow power leveling
posted by wow power leveling, at 8/04/2009 11:06 PM

南京麦瑞货架制造有限公司是国内专业从事仓储货架及仓储设备集研发、生产、销售、安装于一体的大规模企业之一。汇集国内仓储设备制造业众多技术精英 ...南京北春货架制造有限公司为您量身订做各类仓储货架及货架配套设备,满足您的存储要求,合理使用空间.为客户提供一体化的货架解决方案仓储规划、制造、安装及售后服务等 ...托盘是静态货物转变成动态货物的载体,一般用于装卸搬运、仓储保管以及运输,南京麦瑞，拥有十年的托盘制造经验。主要生产钢托盘,木托盘,以及网格托盘等特种托盘。南京麦瑞塑料托盘制造有限公司是专业生产塑料托盘企业是中国塑料托盘知名品牌,南京麦瑞牌塑料托盘是南京市名牌产品,是中国塑料托盘协会会员是中国物流与采购联合会会员 ...Google排名专家提供专业的Google左侧排名技术服务，可以为您获得好的Google排名，如果您需要Google左侧排名技术服务，请联系Google排名专家，我们为您提供稳定的Google ...
posted by SEO, at 8/14/2009 9:53 PM

提供google排名产品，包括google排名服务，众多的google排名信息、google排名咨询，尽在google排名网。
角钢货架，万能角钢货架，南京货架
 轻型货架，北京货架，托盘包装
 中型货架，中量型货架，置物柜
 重型货架，重型仓储货架，上海货架
 托盘货架，上海货架厂，小推车
 横梁货架，横梁式货架，塑胶托盘
 阁楼货架，阁楼式货架，货位式货架
 密集架，深圳货架厂，推车
 悬臂货架，悬臂式货架，广州货架厂
 贯通货架，贯通式货架，卡板
 通廊式货架，深圳货架，苏州货架
 驶入式货架，广州货架，浙江货架
 流利条，天津货架，沈阳货架
 江苏货架，无锡货架，天津木托盘
 杭州货架，宁波货架，熏蒸木托盘
 济南货架，青岛货架，蜂窝纸托盘
 重庆货架，广东货架，食品托盘
 货架公司，成都货架，塑料卡板
 货架厂，货架设计，货架设备
 仓储货架，货架厂家，货架网
 移动货架，移动式货架，货架制造
 货架加工，货架配件，生产货架
 服装货架，货架制作，销售货架
 货架价格，货架图片，展示货架
 仓库货架，库房货架，精品货架
 图书货架，音像货架，百变货架
 物流货架，商场货架，线棒货架
 东莞货架，设备货架，不锈钢货架
 抽屉式货架，重力式货架，立体货架
 模具架，钢平台，档案密集架
 超市货架，收银台，超市设备
 线棒，仓储物流设备，园林垃圾桶
 塑料垃圾桶，上海物流设备，药品柜
 分类垃圾桶，物流设备有限公司，陪护椅
 垃圾桶，物流设备公司，医用消毒柜
posted by 度, at 8/20/2009 1:05 AM

Ugg Amelie Suede
UGG Bailey Button
UGG Classic Cardy
UGG Classic Crochet
UGG Classic Mini
UGG Classic Short
UGG Classic Tall
Ugg Gypsy Sandal
Ugg Halendi Sandal
UGG Hammond Slipper
UGG Infant's Erin Baby
UGG Layback Slipper
UGG Locarno
Ugg Matala Sandal
Ugg Napoule Sandal
UGG New style
UGG Nightfall
Ugg Persephone Sandal
Ugg Skimmer
UGG Sundance
Ugg Tasmina
UGG Ultra Short
UGG Ultra Tall
UGG Women's Coquette
UGG Women's Knightsbridg
UGG Women's Mayfaire
posted by peggy, at 12/14/2009 9:51 PM

ugg shoes
ugg boots
ugg
ugg sale
fake ugg
ugg store
ugg discount
men's ugg
womens ugg
buy ugg boots
ugg cardy
replica ugg
cheap ugg
ugg classic
Ugg Amelie Suede
UGG Bailey Button
UGG Classic Cardy
UGG Classic Crochet
UGG Classic Mini
UGG Classic Short
UGG Classic Tall
Ugg Gypsy Sandal
Ugg Halendi Sandal
UGG Hammond Slipper
UGG Infant's Erin Baby
UGG Layback Slipper
UGG Locarno
Ugg Matala Sandal
Ugg Napoule Sandal
UGG New style
UGG Nightfall
Ugg Persephone Sandal
Ugg Skimmer
UGG Sundance
Ugg Tasmina
UGG Ultra Short
UGG Ultra Tall
UGG Women's Coquette
UGG Women's Knightsbridg
UGG Women's Mayfaire
posted by 力, at 12/21/2009 11:34 PM