Tuesday, March 08, 2005
by Wayne Besen
The Achilles heel of the modern GOP is that it is a movement rather than a traditional political party. While this arrangement serves as a campaign advantage because it instills message discipline, it leads to habitual overreaching when the Republican Party assumes the mantle of power. Political pragmatism is a strong check on unfettered power, while movements are designed by nature to simply want more.
A chest-thumping Republican Party seems intent on following Newt Gingrich’s path to oblivion by threatening to shut down the government if it doesn’t get its way. Instead of listening to the American people, it is listening to "movement conservatives" who wrongly believethe GOP is strong enough to ram through unpopular ideas.
. Easy terrorist access to firearms, thanks to the NRA and theircongressional allies
. Pushing for the repeal of Article 2, Section 1 of the 22nd Amendment to allow Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to run for president
. Bush’s efforts to subvert the New Deal by undermining Social Security
. The GOP’s attempt to shut down the government by eliminating the filibuster
This week, the General Accounting Office released a report that showed over a nine-month period, officials approved 47 of 58 gun applications from terror suspects. This ought to make the hair stand up on the neck of anyone afraid of terrorism, including conservative Democrats,moderate Republicans and independent swing voters.
Currently, records of gun purchases by terror suspects must be destroyed within 24 hours. This is a direct result of a change in the law last year that was mandated by Congress and supported by the Bush administration. Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., has sponsored a bill that would change the law so records on gun purchases by suspected terrorists will be kept for a minimum of ten years.
The Democrats ought to forcefully advocate Lautenberg’s bill, thus putting the GOP leadership in the tough spot of having to choose between national security and the NRA. I would place my bet with the GOP supporting the NRA which would create a huge opening the Democrats could capitalize on to expand their credibility on national security issues.
I know this sounds counterintuitive, but the Democrats should aggressively push for the repeal of Article 2, Section 1 of the 22nd Amendment, which only allows a natural born citizen to be eligible for the presidency. Sure, this would clear the path for California Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to run for president. However,his ascendance is a much greater threat to the Republican Right than it
is to Democrats.
By pushing hard for repeal, Democrats can appear bipartisan and support common sense legislation. It will also, once again, put the conservative GOP leadership in a painfully awkward position. They know if they support repeal, there is a good chance that the moderate Schwarzenegger will be the Republican frontrunner in 2008.
Schwarzenegger, as the nominee, is completely unacceptable to the Tom DeLay wing of the party. With their backs against the wall,conservatives will thwart a repeal effort, thus appearing obstructionist and alienating mainstream voters in their own party. Trust me, Conan will never make it past the congressional barbarians.
It is clear that Bush’s attempt to undermine Social Security by replacing the safety net with a risky privatization scheme has backfired. Bush will dig his own grave if only the Democrats will stop looking intransigent. On Meet the Press, Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said that private accounts are off the table.
What he should say is "the Democrats will support private accounts the very moment the president credibly shows that these accounts will address solvency." The Democrats should steadfastly avoid saying that anything is "off the table" because it makes Bush appear like the reasonable problem solver, rather than a huckster with a cruel plan.
The final issue in the trap is Sen. Bill Frist’s, R-Tenn., threat to go "nuclear" and take away the Democrats right to filibuster judicial nominees. This would be an unprecedented, anti-American power-grab by the GOP. Democrats should portray such a move as a "government shutdown" to make the GOP seem petty and dictatorial.
Movements are great during campaigns because the faithful readily take marching orders. But governing by ideological movement decree can also lead a party to march off a cliff.
5 Comments:
great insights wayne, do you have any way of getting these ideas to howard dean?
posted by , at
9:24 AM
You are wrong on the guns for terrorists thing. I live in Missouri and believe me the hillbillies who vote Republican won't care if terrorists get guns so long as they as Americans can return fire. Here's your Karl Rove thought on this, "Yes it is terrible that terror suspects are getting guns leagally but we should not strenghten gun laws but weaken them so more Americans can defend themselves against these terrorists if they should use those guns." I know it sounds crazy but it works in the red states I am very sad to say.
posted by , at
11:19 AM
I don't understand these figures, below!! WHY would our government approve gun applications from ANY terror suspects?? ... What kind of guns? ... Something seems out of whack.
"This week, the General Accounting Office released a report that showed over a nine-month period, officials approved 47 of 58 gun applications from terror suspects.
"This ought to make the hair stand up on the neck of anyone afraid of terrorism, including conservative Democrats,moderate Republicans and independent swing voters."
I totally agree.
posted by yragnalpac, at
11:03 PM
The explaination is quite simple:
Gun ownership is a civil right. To take a civil right away from somebody, you have to either get them declared mentally incompetent, or charge them with a crime, and convince a jury to convict them.
These are *suspects*. They haven't been proven guilty of ANYTHING. Until they are, they have to be treated as though they were, what's that word? Oh, yeah, "innocent".
I'm curious which other civil liberties you're in favor of letting the government take away, simply by putting somebody on a list. Voting, maybe? Freedom of speech?
posted by , at
5:48 AM
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,按摩棒,跳蛋,充氣娃娃,免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,A片,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛,A片,色情,成人,做愛,情色文學,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,視訊聊天室,言情小說,愛情小說,AIO,AV片,A漫,av dvd,聊天室,自拍,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,色情A片,情趣用品,A片,免費A片,AV女優,美女視訊,情色交友,色情網站,免費AV,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,成人影片,情色網,sex,情趣用品,A片,免費A片,日本A片,A片下載,線上A片,成人電影,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,微風成人區,成人文章,成人影城,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,臺灣情色網,色情,情色電影,色情遊戲,嘟嘟情人色網,麗的色遊戲,情色論壇,色情網站,一葉情貼圖片區,做愛,性愛,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,視訊交友網,免費視訊聊天,美女交友,做愛影片,情境坊歡愉用品,情趣用品,情人節禮物,情惑用品性易購,av,情趣用品,a片,成人電影,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,成人貼圖,成人交友,成人圖片,18成人,成人小說,成人圖片區,成人文章,成人影城,愛情公寓,情色,情色貼圖,色情聊天室,情色視訊,情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,aio,av女優,AV,免費A片,日本a片,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,聊天室,美女交友,成人光碟
posted by sexy, at
10:14 AM
<< Home
